The Washington Post said that the US military leadership does not want the presence of military advisers in the ranks of advanced during the battles fought by irregular Iraqi forces backing Shiite organization against the Islamic state of a Sunni background.
Commanders and justified according to the newspaper that Washington's refusal is the need that the Iraqi military leaders assume their responsibilities in the face of state regulation and being able to retake areas seized by the organization during the past two years.
For his part, Senator John McCain demanded that are routed through the bombing of US advisers were in the front line. On the other hand, experts said that the advisory function key; is "to make sure Iraqi officers bear responsibility." The difference between these two great things. But the defeat of the Islamic state, still the question is: Do I have to increase the bombing or change leaders?
The newspaper added, "We look at air traffic control first; The control unit operates as part of a team of a dozen soldiers, in addition to the vehicles, and put reinforcements on alert, and the use of aircraft for the evacuation operations, and logistics. Thus, you will require the inclusion of control in Fallujah battles teams , gray or commitment by thousands of Americans. "
The newspaper pointed out that the hard part is the presence of US soldiers on the ground, describing it as "urban combat" and wondered "advisers and air traffic controllers Americans working in support of Iraqi units. Thus, if detained civilians terrorists shields, it is responsible for determining the rules of engagement, and the risks that may on civilians? Is it the Iraqi leader who will shout "toss the bomb" or American lieutenant who will advise? ".
Among the reasons that prevent Washington and the presence of US troops and advisers in developed rows of battles is the unwillingness of advisers for the bombing; Mushir out that if Washington decided it must create public opinion in advance of it, and that the American public is willing to witness the amazing amount of devastation.
It is noteworthy that in less than 20 days in 2004, the Marines launched 540 air raid in Fallujah, and destroyed or seriously damaged 18 thousand buildings However, in the year 2015, occupies an Islamic state dozens of cities; will these cities be mined.
And put a paper to the Arab media, adding "will broadcast Al-Jazeera, and other coverage for Photos damages, will be some of the scenes are shocking, and will Iraqi soldiers carried out the death sentences against the terrorists of the Islamic state before the eyes of advisers. Has been arrested on the US and burned alive! If we sent units of air traffic control , will we have declared our commitment to the war without getting the consensus of my people at home, and with the generals to let Iraqis, Iranians and determine the strategy of the battle for us. "
The paper said that the Iraqi government pursue a curriculum bias against Sunnis as it has ruled out a number of officers who have been trained by US troops, in 2011. The year has been persecuted since then, and rose an Islamic state. Today, the Iranian Guards and Shiite militias loyal to Tehran's influence in Baghdad is greater than the influence of the United States.
The Washington Post noted that following the signing of the agreement with Iran will not interfere in what American officers and their religions and therefore, we have no interest in re-specialist officers, and non-sectarian.
Each of the intelligence community has recommended, military and civilian leadership at the Pentagon, and the State Department, to leave troops in Iraq, but Obama decided otherwise. Similarly, Obama has promised to remove the regime of Bashar Assad of Syria, and then did nothing while an Islamic state that turned the nation into its lair. Now, the US President is facing the tragic consequences. And as commander in chief, Obama can political, military and strategic components of coordination; launch a resolute war. But he refrained from doing so until now.
The newspaper concluded its report by saying "pay consultants will lead to the front lines to put our forces under the effective control of the government is credible in Baghdad. It will put us deployment of air traffic controllers on the front lines in the midst of a war does not have our Commander in Chief intention to win. And therefore should be calling us Republicans to step up gradually reminds us of what happened in Vietnam, and in the end, Obama lacks a credible policy to support veterans year, the leadership supported by US firepower. Thus, the longer our generals refrain from commitment to being involved in this ground war in the absence of the political will of the state, and popular support is right
| روابط هذه التدوينة قابلة للنسخ واللصق | |
| URL | |
| HTML | |
| BBCode | |
kamindoz

