Apart from computer fraud charges, Brown is also facing prosecution for
allegedly threatening an FBI agent and for alleged obstruction of
justice.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world, released a statement on the decision: “We
are relieved that federal prosecutors have decided to drop these
charges against Barrett Brown. In prosecuting Brown, the government
sought to criminalize a routine practice of journalism—linking to
external sources—which is a textbook violation of free speech protected
by the First Amendment.”
Brown is a well known figure in hacking and internet freedom circles,
having had his writings published in outlets such as Vanity Fair and the
Guardian. In September 2012, he was arrested by Law enforcement
officers in a dramatic raid of his apartment, while he was having a live
online video chat session with a few others.
Until his arrest, he ran a collaborative web publication very well known as
Project PM that engaged in issues relating to official leaks and the work of the hacking collective
Anonymous.
Kevin Gallagher, the director of the Free Barrett Brown support network, who think that the prosecution’s decision “unexpected and amazing,” said in a statement:
“The charges against Barrett Brown for linking were flawed from the
beginning. In the face of a rigorous legal challenge mounted by his
defense, the government has finally recognized it and signaled that this
is a battle they don’t want to fight.”
Brown, currently being held in Texas, has spent more than a year behind
bars and still faces up to 70 years in prison. Brown has two trials
scheduled for April 28 and May 19, respectively, where he will be seen
answering 17 charges related to his work on uncovering online
surveillance.
Now, this is not the first time when the US government has forced strict
laws against the hacktivists, last year, a 26-year-old, Reddit
cofounder and the digital Activist,
Aaron H. Swartz
committed suicide, who was accused of hacking the MIT JSTOR database
and charged $4 million in fines and up to 50 years in prison by the
Court.